06.21
I still encounter people who are confused by the disk options in Hyper-V. Altaro have updated their blog with a post, discussing the merits of passthrough (raw) disk, fixed VHD, and dynamic VHD and it’s worth a read. Being a storage company, it’s worth paying attention to their observations.
Further to their notes I’d add:
- Windows Server 2012 adds a new VHDX format that is 4K aligned and expands out to 64 TB (VHD max is 2040 GB and VMDK is 2 TB).
- Storage level backup cannot be done using passthrough disks so you have to revert to traditional backup processes.
- Passthrough disks lock your VM into a physical location and you lose flexibility.
- Advanced features like snapshots and Hyper-V Replica cannot be implemented with passthrough disks.
- In production I always favour Fixed VHD over Dynamic. However, I can understand if you choose Dynamic VHD for your OS VHDs (with no data at all) and place these onto a dedicated CSV (with no data VHDs on it) – assuming that data VHDs are fixed and placed on different CSVs.
Have a read of the Altaro post and make up your own mind.
Copyright Warning
This blog post is the property of Aidan Finn (@joe_elway / http://www.aidanfinn.com) and may not be reused in any manner without prior consent of Aidan Finn. You may quote one paragraph from this blog post if you link to the original blog post.
Related posts:
- A WS2012 Hyper-V Converged Fabric Design With Host And Guest iSCSI Connections
- Another WS2012 Hyper-V Converged Fabric Design With Host & Guest iSCSI Networks
- Altaro Hyper-V Backup 3.5 Is Released – Adding Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Support
- Rewritten My FreeBSD On Hyper-V Post To Get The Facts Straight




No Comment.
Add Your Comment