2012
07.18

I think I’ve talked about how VDI makes no financial sense once or twice before.  The Register has a story on how Gartner has analysed the costs of implementing and owning VDI.  Long story short: it costs as much if not more (I say much more) than buying and owning PCs.  The reason to implement VDI isn’t simplified management, it isn’t reduced costs.  It is the side effects of centralisation such as easier data access and stricter security. 

Personally I think RDS Session Hosts (Terminal Servers) are a much more cost effective way of getting these same results, possibly with App-V to prevent application silos.

1 comment so far

Add Your Comment
  1. I agree, I have not read the report yet but I hope it included the additional costs of paying qualified, educated, skilled SysAdmins to maintain and operate a VDI solution. And yes, that is plural. It is amazing to me how companies think they can also reduce the workforce if they implement VDI versus Physical Desktops.

Get Adobe Flash player